http://www.ditdotdat.org/bigcity/2005/04/bbc-doesnt-fall-for-tech-hoax/ Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:53:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.ditdotdat.org/bigcity/2005/04/bbc-doesnt-fall-for-tech-hoax/comment-page-1/#comment-17 ditdotdat Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:03:00 +0000 http://www.ditdotdat.org/wordpress/2005/04/06/bbc-doesnt-fall-for-tech-hoax/#comment-17 Thanks for that link anonymous benefactor. I should have known it was too good to be true. Those poor saps at News Online were just bound to fall for it. I suppose I was just being too optimistic. Thanks for that link anonymous benefactor. I should have known it was too good to be true. Those poor saps at News Online were just bound to fall for it. I suppose I was just being too optimistic.

]]> http://www.ditdotdat.org/bigcity/2005/04/bbc-doesnt-fall-for-tech-hoax/comment-page-1/#comment-16 underfive Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:27:00 +0000 http://www.ditdotdat.org/wordpress/2005/04/06/bbc-doesnt-fall-for-tech-hoax/#comment-16 ryc: thanks for coming by. what you commented reminded me about the incomprehensible dynamics that exist between God and man... man and man. what a big, yet small, world we live in! ryc: thanks for coming by. what you commented reminded me about the incomprehensible dynamics that exist between God and man… man and man. what a big, yet small, world we live in!

]]> http://www.ditdotdat.org/bigcity/2005/04/bbc-doesnt-fall-for-tech-hoax/comment-page-1/#comment-15 Anonymous Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:44:00 +0000 http://www.ditdotdat.org/wordpress/2005/04/06/bbc-doesnt-fall-for-tech-hoax/#comment-15 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/3673093.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/3673093.stm

]]>